That thing I don't write much about

I haven't added much to the debate about Joe Lieberman (I support Lamont of course). But Dan Froomkin mentions something today:

Reuters reports: "President George W. Bush is considering a new effort to have John Bolton confirmed as the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, a year after appointing him to the job over Senate objections, aides said on Thursday. . . .

Fresh off of saying that a dead Lebanese child isn't as tragic as a dead Israeli child -- in the wake of so many other non-diplomatic non-triumphs -- one might ask:

"Senator Lieberman, would you support Bolton's nomination to the UN?

Yes,

or

No?