Saturday, December 18, 2010

That's FoxNews for ya!


Who can be surprised that FoxNews would respond to a University study finding its viewers were by far the most misinformed consumers of news with an ad hominem attack that turned out to be...very inaccurate?

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

Ignoring Faux is about the best I can do. Blowing it up would be a worthwhile mission. It may explode from its own gases is a fond Christmas wish.
vox

ajm said...

Murdoch's strategy: Deflect, deflect, deflect.

"Anything that keeps people stupid is a felony." -- Harlan Ellison

StonyPillow said...

Anti-American reactionary Australian propaganda.

Harry R. Sohl said...

I was wondering if we could do a class-action suit for False Advertising, or even Product Liability since they call themselves "News"?

Section 2 of the Restatement (Third) of Torts: Products Liability distinguishes between three major types of product liability claims:

* manufacturing defect,
* design defect,
* a failure to warn (also known as marketing defects).


FOX clearly suffers from all three.

pansypoo said...

fux viewers don't care. it's cozy there.

Anonymous said...

What StonyPillow said. I would urge everyone to attach the adjective "anti-American" to FOX NEWS, and Republican every time the despicable words are used.

Fred Flintstone