Tuesday, March 20, 2012

What I really want to know is...

First, interesting this is even asked:

Public Policy Polling (D) asked the following question of Americans nationally: "Mitt Romney once strapped his dog’s kennel to the roof of his car for a long car trip. Does this make you more or less likely to vote for him, or does it not make a difference?" ...

The results were not good for Romney -- 35 percent of Americans said they were less likely to vote for Romney based on the story, while seven percent said it made them more likely to vote Romney, and a majority of 55 percent said it didn't matter.


I can understand the 35 percent, I can also understand the 55 percent. But what kind of person would be MORE LIKELY to vote for Romney for abusing a dog?

 Oh, right.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

Ah, yes... can't you just tell by their approving comments about the black kid being shot that these folks are "pro-life".

StonyPillow said...

Face it, tho -- most of that segment of the Republican population will be voting for "Man On Dog" Santorum.

As did I. Obama unopposed, two identical twin Blue Dogs (Tammy and Raja) running for the right to beat "Deadbeat Dad" Walsh in IL-08 in November. No point in pulling a Democratic primary ballot, no real Democrats there. And Santorum is by far the weakest Republican candidate, a sure loser.

First time in my life. Dammit, I need a long shower with a lot of soap.

Anonymous said...

We are talking the Rethug base here. Romney being outed as a cruel sadist and torturer of the helpless makes him one of the coven.

pansypoo said...

they don't like helping people, why would they care for a dog?